Hiring IT talent in Korea: realistic job ads and pay that matches skills
For employers hiring tech staff in Korea: why 'no one to hire' often means inflated job ads or below-market pay, and what Korea's hiring law requires.
At a glance
- Job ad law applies to
- Businesses with 30 or more regular employees
- False job ad
- Up to 5 years in prison or a ₩20,000,000 fine
- Worse terms after hiring
- Administrative fine of up to ₩5,000,000
- Do not ask about
- Looks, birthplace, marital status, family details
- Top hiring hurdle for SMEs
- Workers' high pay expectations (Bank of Korea, 2025)
- Author's main advice
- Separate must-have skills from nice-to-have ones
Many companies in Korea say they cannot find IT staff, especially in data and AI, while many job seekers cannot find work. This guide is for foreign founders, managers and HR staff hiring tech talent in Korea. It explains the causes the author sees behind this mismatch and the rules that apply to job ads, with data as of 2025~2026.
Why companies say no one is available
A recruiter with long experience placing data specialists describes a hidden premise behind many complaints: the wish to hire excellent people at a low cost. Companies offer below-market pay, still ask for top-level skills, and then conclude that there is no one to hire. The gap is widest at startups and smaller companies that want large-company talent but cannot match large-company pay.
Official data point the same way. In a Bank of Korea (한국은행) survey of 400 companies, published in December 2025, most firms planned to hire more AI staff, but workers' high pay expectations were the top hiring difficulty for small and medium-sized companies and the second for large ones. The Bank counted about 57,000 AI specialists in Korea in 2024, more than double the 27,800 of 2010, yet companies still say they cannot find people.
Not every company can pay top salaries. The author's point is narrower: pay should match the level of skill you ask for.
Job descriptions nobody can meet
As cloud services spread and tech stacks grew, many job ads began to ask one person to do the work of several. An ad for a junior developer may list front-end and back-end development, database management, cloud infrastructure and even data analysis. HR advisers reviewing such ads often ask whether anyone with all these skills exists. If such a person did, they would probably have founded a startup or joined a company with better terms.
Unrealistic requirements also scare away capable applicants with potential. The company keeps searching for a superhero, and applicants feel they are not good enough.
The problem shows up in data. At a Bank of Korea seminar in December 2025, the job platform Remember (리멤버) reported that companies often lacked a clear definition of AI roles (about 30%) and that in more than half of cases the job ad did not match the actual work.
How technology changed the roles
In the author's view, cloud computing, AI and big data have raised demand for IT talent over the past several years faster than supply. Companies responded by asking each hire to cover more, and roles once split between developers, operators and analysts were merged under labels such as full-stack engineer. Technology has made work more efficient, but the author argues that one person doing everything is close to a fantasy, and that a specialist in one field often creates more value than a generalist who knows a little of everything.
Hiring managers and HR need to talk
Hiring managers tend to list their ideal candidate, and HR copies the list into the ad. Ads often list every task the current employee performs, but that employee did not start with all of those skills; they learned on the job. Some companies even ask one new hire to take over work that several people shared after someone left. It saves money on paper but usually ends in a failed search and a bigger loss.
What the law says about job ads
The Fair Hiring Procedure Act (채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률) applies to hiring at businesses with 30 or more regular employees, except when the state or local governments hire public servants (Article 3).
| Rule | Article | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| No false job ads, for example to collect ideas or promote the business | 4(1) | Up to 5 years in prison or a fine of up to ₩20,000,000 (Article 16) |
| No unfavorable change to the content of the ad without a justified reason | 4(2) | Administrative fine of up to ₩5,000,000 (Article 17) |
| No unfavorable change to the advertised working conditions after hiring without a justified reason | 4(3) | Administrative fine of up to ₩5,000,000 (Article 17) |
| No requests for information the job does not need: looks, height or weight; birthplace, marital status or property; education, jobs or property of the applicant's parents, children and siblings | 4-3 | Administrative fine of up to ₩5,000,000 (Article 17) |
In practice, the pay and conditions in your ad are commitments. Write an ad you can stand behind.
The job seeker's side
The author does not blame companies alone. Some candidates overrate their skills or ask for high pay without enough preparation, especially since high IT salaries became widely known. A short bootcamp or online course helps, but it cannot replace in-depth knowledge and work experience. These expectations are partly shaped by the market itself: when companies post inflated requirements, candidates read the market in a distorted way too.
A healthier hiring process
For companies, the author suggests:
- Write realistic job descriptions. Separate must-have skills from preferred ones and focus on the core tasks of the role.
- Offer pay at market level. If the budget is tight, offer other rewards, such as stock options, flexible working or support for training.
- Hire for potential as well as ready-made talent, and invest in training. It costs more at first but builds loyal core staff.
- Let HR and hiring managers plan together. Decide what the organization needs for long-term growth instead of simply filling an empty seat.
For job seekers: assess your skills honestly, keep learning, and build depth in one field rather than trying to learn everything at once.
The author's conclusion: do not look for someone cheap and good; look for someone who can grow with your organization.
Checklist
- Split requirements into must-have and nice-to-have.
- Compare your pay offer with the market for the same role and level.
- Check that the pay and conditions in the ad match the contract you will offer.
- Remove questions about looks, birthplace, marital status, property and family details.
- Agree the role with the hiring manager before posting.
- Plan onboarding and training for a candidate with potential.
Korean terms you will see
| Term | Reading | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 채용공고 | chaeyong gonggo | Job ad or job posting. |
| 직무기술서 | jingmu gisulseo | Job description: the tasks and skills of a role. |
| 우대사항 | udae sahang | Preferred qualifications, the nice-to-have part of an ad. |
| 자격요건 | jagyeok yogeon | Required qualifications, the must-have part of an ad. |
| 연봉 | yeonbong | Annual salary. |
| 공개채용 | gonggae chaeyong | Open recruitment, usually a yearly intake of new graduates. |
| 상시채용 | sangsi chaeyong | Rolling recruitment: hiring whenever a position opens. |
| 채용절차법 | chaeyong jeolchabeop | Short name of the Fair Hiring Procedure Act. |
| 과태료 | gwataeryo | Administrative fine imposed by an authority, not a criminal penalty. |
| 스톡옵션 | seutok obsyeon | Stock option: the right to buy company shares at a set price. |
Sources
- Fair Hiring Procedure Act, Articles 3, 4, 4-3, 16 and 17 (채용절차의 공정화에 관한 법률 제3조·제4조·제4조의3·제16조·제17조): https://www.law.go.kr/법령/채용절차의%20공정화에%20관한%20법률
- Bank of Korea blog on BOK Issue Note No. 2025-36, AI specialists: size, pay and mobility, December 24, 2025 (한국은행 블로그 「AI 인재 5.7만 명 시대, 왜 기업은 사람이 없다고 할까?」, BOK 이슈노트 제2025-36호): https://www.bok.or.kr/portal/bbs/B0000347/view.do?nttId=10095282&menuNo=201106
- Hankyoreh report on BOK Issue Note No. 2025-36, December 2025 (한겨레 「한은 “국내 AI 전문인력 임금 프리미엄, 미국의 1/5 수준”」): https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/economy_general/1233066.html
This guide explains general rules as of Oct 23, 2026. It is not legal or tax advice. Laws and forms change, so check the official website or ask a licensed professional before you act.

